The plasma permeability factor in nephrotic syndrome: indirect evidence in pediatric peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children has been associated with a systemic circulating permeability factor. Therefore, once peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been started, peritoneal protein losses should be higher in the nephrotic than in the non-nephrotic population. OBJECTIVE: We compared peritoneal protein losses in children with and without NS on PD. METHODS: Our retrospective 4-year study analyzed Hispanic patients with NS under PD. Data at dialysis entry and 6 months later were compared. Nutritional support was given according to recommended dietary allowances and recommendations from the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative. Clinical and biochemical data were obtained, and 24-hour dialysate and urine samples were collected to measure protein losses. Dialysis dose (Kt/V), daily protein intake (DPI), normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA), peritoneal equilibration test (PET), and peritonitis rate were determined. All measurements took place at least 4 weeks after resolution of a peritonitis episode. All patients received automated PD using a HomeChoice PD System cycler (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA), with an exchange volume of 1100 mL/m(2) and a dextrose concentration of 1.5% - 2.5%. A control group of non-NS children on PD matched by age and sex were also studied. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U-test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Each study group consisted of 10 patients [NS patients: 4 boys, mean age of 7.3 ± 4.1 years; control patients: 6 boys, mean age of 7.2 ± 4.7 years (p = nonsignificant)]. In the group with NS, 8 patients were diagnosed by biopsy as having focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and 2 as having minimal-change disease. At study entry, patients with NS had hourly urinary protein losses of 398 ± 313 mg/m(2) and daily peritoneal protein losses of 3.4 ± 1.9 g/m(2), compared with 29.9 ± 31 mg/m(2) and 1.5 ± 1.1 g/m(2) respectively in the control group (p < 0.05). The same statistical difference was found 6 months later. We observed no statistical differences in PET results, daily exchange volume, and mean dextrose concentration of dialysate. Similarly, no significant between-group differences were observed for Kt/V, DPI, nPNA, and biochemical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic children with NS on PD show higher peritoneal protein losses than do their control counterparts. Such differences could be secondary to increased peritoneal permeability caused by a systemic permeability factor.

Short PET in pediatric peritoneal dialysis.

Peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is a common technique used in children to evaluate peritoneal membrane transport capacity and adequate the dialysis regimen. Considering that this is a laborious test, a shortened version has been proposed. Our goal was to evaluate the concordance between the 2-h (short) and 4-h (classical) PET values to determine whether the short PET could be used in the clinical setting. Eighty-one PET corresponding to 81 peritoneal dialysis patients from two pediatric nephrology centers were retrospectively analyzed. Peritoneal transport capacity was evaluated using the dialysate to plasma ratio (D/P) of creatinine and the ratio of dialysate glucose to baseline dialysate glucose (D/D(0)) at 2 and 4 h. The mean [+/- standard deviation (SD)] creatinine D/P ratio at 2 and 4 h were 0.41 +/- 0.13 and 0.66 +/- 0.17, respectively, and the mean (+/- SD) D/D(0) glucose were 0.64 +/- 0.11 and 0.39 +/- 0.12 at the same times. Applying McNemar chi(2) test to evaluate the association between the categories obtained at 2 and 4 h, we found no relationship between the 2- and 4-h PET for both D/P and D/D(0) (p > 0.05). These results suggest that the use of this abbreviated test is probably not reliable for estimating the transport capacity of the peritoneal membrane in the pediatric population.